Reactive
Maintenance happens when something stops
Servicing is remembered under pressure, so the plant runs on repairs rather than on a plan.
Machine / Tools Maintenance
Service the Machine Before It Stops the Line
Plans that fire on the calendar or the hours run, breakdowns recorded with their downtime and root cause, spares consumed against the job, and a cost figure for every asset.
- Usage-based triggers
- Downtime recorded
- Cost per asset
Planned, not remembered
Triggers on a date or on running hours, whichever comes first.
Root cause recorded
So the same fault three times reads as one problem.
Spares against the job
Consumption tied to the machine that needed them.
A number to argue with
Labour and parts per asset, so replacement is a calculation.
An unplanned stop costs more than the repair that follows it.
Three gaps account for most of the downtime a plant absorbs, and none of them is an engineering problem.
Unexplained
The same fault, again
Each breakdown is fixed and forgotten, so a machine failing three times a year looks like bad luck.
Uncounted
Nobody knows what a machine costs to keep
Labour and parts are absorbed into overheads, so replacing an asset is argued rather than calculated.
Neome closes all three by planning on usage, recording the cause, and counting what each asset costs.
Preventive
Maintenance triggered by the calendar or by the hours run
A plan fires on a date or on usage, whichever comes first, and raises the task with its checklist and a named technician. Servicing on running hours rather than the calendar alone is what stops a lightly used machine being over-serviced and a hard-worked one being missed.
- Calendar and usage triggers
- Tasks generated automatically
- Checklist per plan
Breakdowns
Record the downtime and the reason, not just the repair
A breakdown raises a work order that captures when the line stopped, how long it was down and what actually caused it. Root cause is a field rather than a conversation, which is the only way a repeating fault becomes visible as a pattern instead of a run of separate incidents.
- Work order on breakdown
- Downtime recorded
- Root cause documented
Spares
Parts consumed against the machine that needed them
Spares are issued from stock against the work order, so consumption is tied to the asset and the job. Critical components carry reorder alerts, because discovering that the last seal has gone is a discovery best made before the line is already stopped.
- Issued against the job
- Consumption per machine
- Reorder alerts on critical spares
History
One machine, one history, patterns included
Every service and every failure sits on the asset, so three seal failures in fourteen months read as one problem rather than three repairs. That history is what turns an argument about replacing a machine into a calculation.
- Full history per asset
- Repeat faults visible
- Service and failure together
Reporting
What each asset costs, and how much of the month it ran
Set a date range and every figure below it is bounded by those dates.
Availability
Is the plant meeting its plan?
Uptime against planned running time per machine, which turns a vague sense that the line keeps stopping into a number.
Downtime by reason
Why does it stop?
Hours lost grouped by cause, so a recurring fault is visible instead of being absorbed into the general noise of a shift.
Cost per asset
What is it costing to keep?
Labour and parts booked against the machine that consumed them, which is the figure that makes a replacement decision arguable rather than instinctive.
All the features, done right
Asset register
Machines and tools, by line and plant.
Calendar plans
Servicing on a date.
Usage triggers
Servicing on running hours.
Task checklists
What the service actually involves.
Technician assignment
Named, with a schedule.
Breakdown reporting
A work order, not a phone call.
Root cause
A field, so patterns can be found.
Downtime tracking
How long the line was actually stopped.
Spare parts
Issued against the work order.
Critical spare alerts
Before the line stops, not during.
Asset history
Services and failures in one list.
Cost per asset
Labour and parts, per machine.
Before you move your maintenance across
The questions maintenance teams ask before the first plan is set up in Neome.
What it costs
One price, and Machine / Tools Maintenance is already in it
₹299/ user / month$9.99/ user / month
There is no separate charge for this module. The same per-user price covers Machine / Tools Maintenance and the other 25+ modules, so adding a second or third one costs nothing extra.
- 15-day free trial
- No credit card to start
- Billed monthly · Minimum 5 users
Related Modules
AMC & Service Management Software
Hold every AMC contract with what it covers, generate the preventive visits it entitles the customer to, track SLA, and renew before cover ends.
Learn moreManufacturing Software for Small Business
Version-controlled bills of materials, work orders planned against real capacity, material deducted as output is recorded, and variance raised during the run.
Learn moreQuality Control Software for Manufacturers
Inspection parameters with written tolerances, checks tied to the receipt or work order that caused them, and a real supplier quality record.
Learn moreReady to implement this service?
Talk to our team and get a rollout plan aligned to your business process.